Instant Checkmate
Criminal-record and social-profile search option.
View RecordsSeparate national commercial screening, FBI personal history review and federal court searches, then ask which criminal sources and jurisdictions were actually checked.
A fingerprint-based FBI Identity History Summary is a personal federal repository product built from fingerprint submissions retained by the FBI. The FBI does not provide name checks for this request.
PACER is a national index and document-access system for federal district, bankruptcy and appellate courts. It does not search state or county courts.
NSOPW searches participating jurisdiction public sex-offender registries in real time; DOJ says it is not a single database of every registered person and the public content varies by jurisdiction.
A private provider’s label only becomes meaningful after you know which repositories, courts and jurisdictions it searched, how often data is refreshed, and what matching rules it uses.
The official systems above cover different record families. A useful nationwide check is therefore a documented set of products and jurisdictions matched to the purpose, not a promise that one name search finds every criminal event.
The FBI FAQ states that the Identity History Summary process does not use a name check; current fingerprints are required.
The FBI review notice says the summary is provided for personal review or correction. For many U.S. employment, licensing or adoption uses, an authorized state/federal channel may be required.
It reflects information associated with fingerprint submissions retained by the FBI; it is not described as a scan of every county courthouse in the country.
The FBI allows a challenge to inaccurate or incomplete information and asks for supporting documentation when available.
| PACER route | What it searches | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Specific federal court | Court-specific PACER search | Federal cases in that court; records are updated as filed in CM/ECF. |
| PACER Case Locator | Nationwide index of federal district, bankruptcy and appellate cases | Index is updated daily; follow the case number into the filing court for detail. |
| State/county criminal case | Not a PACER function | PACER expressly says it does not provide state or county court access. |
Check the official state repository or state court system that actually covers those jurisdictions. A federal search does not replace state court or repository data.
Use the county court/clerk when the exact filed case or certified document matters. Local filing details can resolve a charge/disposition ambiguity that a summary report does not.
Treat “no hit” as a result of the stated sources, not proof that no record exists anywhere. Ask the provider what jurisdictions and record types were searched.
NSOPW FAQ says the service searches separate jurisdiction registries in real time, that each jurisdiction controls what it displays, and that users should verify information with the originating jurisdiction. It is useful for the public registry question; it does not replace court, repository or FBI products.
Which state repositories, county courts, federal courts or other databases were actually queried?
Does “nationwide” mean all states, selected jurisdictions, a multi-state database, or only sources the provider can access?
How recent is each source and does the provider revisit the original court before reporting a final disposition?
What identifiers are used to distinguish people with similar names?
How does the provider handle sealed, expunged, restricted or otherwise nonpublic records?
Is the report being used for employment, housing, licensing or another purpose with additional legal requirements?
The FTC explains that when an employer uses a consumer reporting company for a background report, federal law requires disclosure and permission before obtaining the report and specific notices if adverse action may be taken. A DIY search of government sites is not a substitute for understanding the rules that apply to a consumer report used in employment.